FAILURE / STANDALONE TESTBED
Four hardening failures
Reviewer-defined checks exposed problems with malformed requests, exact action/tool/resource authority, conflicting state and duplicate replay.
PROOF / STANDALONE AGENT ASSURANCE
Keep the failure.
Show the repair.
The useful evidence is the change from a failing reviewer-defined test to a hardened version, with the test boundary still visible.
A dated, limited result
Reported in the 12–18 September 2026 accomplishment log.
RETEST / VERSION 1.1.0
106 core checks passed
The hardened v1.1.0 standalone testbed recorded 106 passing core checks after the revisions. This is a result for that testbed and version.
BOUNDARY / NOT A LIVE-RUNTIME CERTIFICATION
What was not tested
Browser UI testing was blocked. The real private APEX runtime, actual models, external services, physical devices and independent review were not tested.
Evidence basis: SRC-WEEKLY-1218. Historical results retain their original test scope.
A reusable assurance pattern
Use explicit permission and state checks, rather than assuming an action is safe because it is requested.
Check the exact action
The tool, resource and action must match the granted authority. General confidence or a loosely related permission is not a substitute.
Resolve state before acting
A repeated or conflicting request must not silently produce a second side effect or overwrite a more recent state.
Retain evidence from both versions
Keep the failing condition, the correction and the retest linked. Later builds need their own checks; they do not inherit a passing score by association.